Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): African Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Development
Articles

AI-Driven Approaches for Fraud Prevention in Health Insurance: Techniques, Models, and Case Studies

Bhavani Prasad Kasaraneni
Independent Researcher, USA
Cover

Published 08-03-2021

Keywords

  • Healthcare Fraud,
  • Machine Learning

How to Cite

[1]
Bhavani Prasad Kasaraneni, “AI-Driven Approaches for Fraud Prevention in Health Insurance: Techniques, Models, and Case Studies ”, African J. of Artificial Int. and Sust. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 136–180, Mar. 2021, Accessed: Nov. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://africansciencegroup.com/index.php/AJAISD/article/view/146

Abstract

Healthcare fraud, encompassing activities intended to receive improper payment for services not rendered or at inflated costs, poses a significant financial burden on the health insurance industry, with estimates suggesting annual losses in the billions of dollars. Traditional rule-based methods for fraud detection, which rely on predefined sets of criteria to flag suspicious claims, often struggle to keep pace with evolving fraudulent schemes and the massive, complex datasets generated within healthcare systems. These datasets encompass a wide range of information, including patient demographics, medical history, treatment records, and billing codes. Manually analyzing such vast amounts of data to identify fraudulent activity is a laborious and time-consuming process, hindering the effectiveness of traditional approaches.

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents a transformative opportunity to address these challenges. AI techniques offer the ability to learn complex patterns from data, enabling them to identify subtle anomalies and inconsistencies that might be indicative of fraudulent behavior. This paper delves into the application of various AI-driven approaches for fraud prevention in health insurance. We comprehensively examine supervised learning algorithms, a branch of machine learning that utilizes labeled data to train models for specific tasks. Supervised learning techniques employed in this domain include anomaly detection, classification, and regression models.

Anomaly detection algorithms excel at identifying data points that deviate significantly from the established patterns within a dataset. In the context of healthcare fraud detection, these algorithms can be trained on historical data that reflects legitimate claims. They can then effectively flag claims with unusual characteristics, such as exorbitant charges for services, uncharacteristically frequent visits to healthcare providers, or claims for procedures not typically performed together. Classification algorithms, on the other hand, are adept at categorizing data points into predefined classes. For instance, a classification model can be trained to classify claims as either fraudulent or legitimate based on the features extracted from the data. Regression models, meanwhile, are employed to predict continuous outcomes. In the context of fraud detection, regression models can be used to estimate the predicted cost of a medical service based on historical data. Significant deviations between the predicted cost and the actual billed amount could then be flagged for further investigation.

Furthermore, the paper investigates the utilization of advanced deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), in healthcare fraud detection. CNNs demonstrate proficiency in analyzing medical images, such as X-rays and MRIs. This capability can be leveraged to identify potential discrepancies between the billed procedures and the medical images submitted as part of a claim. For example, a CNN could detect inconsistencies between the level of detail in an X-ray and the complexity of a procedure being billed. RNNs, with their ability to process sequential data, hold promise for uncovering temporal patterns in claims histories that could be indicative of fraudulent behavior. By analyzing sequences of claims submitted by a particular patient or provider, RNNs can identify red flags such as unusual surges in claim frequency or billing for services that are unlikely to be performed in close succession.

To solidify the theoretical framework, the paper presents a critical evaluation of existing research and case studies that showcase the successful implementation of AI-driven fraud prevention systems in health insurance companies. These case studies illuminate the practical application of AI techniques, highlighting the specific challenges encountered and the solutions adopted to achieve optimal performance. This analysis sheds light on the real-world impact of AI in curbing healthcare fraud and paves the way for further advancements in the field.

The paper acknowledges the inherent challenges associated with AI-based fraud detection systems. These limitations encompass the potential for bias within the training data, the explainability of AI models' decision-making processes, and the ever-evolving nature of fraudulent schemes that necessitate continuous adaptation of the AI models. We propose mitigation strategies and future research directions to address these challenges and further enhance the efficacy of AI-driven fraud prevention in health insurance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ruggieri, M., & Pedreschi, D. (2013). The state of the art in algorithmic bias detection. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 46(4), 1-48. [DOI: 10.1145/2586914.2586915]
  2. Mehrabi, M., Mortazavi, S., Gelband, N., & Kusnecwicz, M. (2020). A survey of bias in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09765.
  3. Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K. W., Gebhardt, J., Ganesh, S. E., & Etal, A. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 29, pp. 1047-1055). [DOI: 10.5555/2937832.2937863]
  4. Feldman, M., Friedler, S., Jain, J., & Schafer, J. (2018). Certifying and removing disparate impact. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 259-268). [DOI: 10.1145/3191502.3191538]
  5. Lundberg, S., Lee, S. I., & Kim, S. M. (2017). Human-in-the-loop interpretable machine learning for medical image analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4497-4506). [DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025920]
  6. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz, N., Serna, J., & Romero, S. (2019). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in medicine: An overview. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 65, 881-954. [DOI: 10.1613/jair.1.11700]
  7. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2019). Transparent and accountable AI for algorithmic justice. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(8), 389-399. [DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1121-y]
  8. Xu, H., Luo, X., & Li, H. (2020). An interpretable attention-based neural network for medical named entity recognition. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 108, 103868. [DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.103868]
  9. Zhang, Y., Sun, C., Luo, Z., & Li, H. (2020). Deep learning for healthcare fraud detection: A survey. IEEE Access, 8, 182193-182210. [DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029221]
  10. Bangalore, H., Cho, K., & Wang, J. (2020). Machine learning for fraud detection in healthcare insurance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.02232.
  11. Ahmed, M. A., Islam, M. M., & Yao, X. (2016). A survey on advanced machine learning techniques for fraud detection. Knowledge and Information Systems, 46(3), 841-867. [DOI: 10.1007/s10115-015-0880-6]
  12. Dou, W., Long, Y., Qin, Z., Wei, J., & Cheng, Y. (2019). An anomaly detection approach based on LSTM for healthcare fraud detection.