Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): African Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Development
Articles

Investigating the Efficacy of Machine Learning Models for Automated Failure Detection and Root Cause Analysis in Cloud Service Infrastructure

Vishal Shahane
Software Engineer, Amazon Web Services, Seattle, WA, United States
Cover

Published 14-09-2022

Keywords

  • machine learning,
  • failure detection,
  • root cause analysis,
  • cloud service infrastructure,
  • anomaly detection,
  • predictive maintenance,
  • telemetry data,
  • reliability,
  • availability
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

[1]
V. Shahane, “Investigating the Efficacy of Machine Learning Models for Automated Failure Detection and Root Cause Analysis in Cloud Service Infrastructure”, African J. of Artificial Int. and Sust. Dev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 26–51, Sep. 2022, Accessed: Jun. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://africansciencegroup.com/index.php/AJAISD/article/view/23

Abstract

Cloud service infrastructure plays a pivotal role in modern IT ecosystems, providing the foundation for a wide array of online services and applications. Ensuring the reliability and availability of cloud services is paramount for maintaining user satisfaction and business continuity. Traditional methods of failure detection and root cause analysis often rely on manual intervention and rule-based approaches, which can be time-consuming and error-prone. This research paper investigates the efficacy of machine learning models for automating failure detection and root cause analysis in cloud service infrastructure.

Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown considerable promise in various domains, including anomaly detection and predictive maintenance. By leveraging historical data and identifying patterns indicative of abnormal behavior, ML models can automatically detect anomalies and potential failures in cloud infrastructure components such as servers, networks, and storage systems. Additionally, ML algorithms can analyze vast amounts of telemetry data generated by cloud services to pinpoint the root causes of failures, enabling rapid resolution and proactive mitigation strategies.

The paper begins by providing an overview of the challenges associated with failure detection and root cause analysis in cloud service infrastructure. These challenges include the dynamic nature of cloud environments, the sheer volume and velocity of telemetry data, and the complexity of interdependent systems and services. Traditional approaches struggle to cope with these challenges, highlighting the need for more advanced, data-driven techniques such as machine learning.

Next, we review existing research and industry practices related to using machine learning for failure detection and root cause analysis in cloud environments. This includes a survey of ML algorithms commonly applied to anomaly detection, such as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and semi-supervised learning. We also examine case studies and real-world deployments where ML-based approaches have been successfully employed to improve the reliability and resilience of cloud services.

To empirically evaluate the efficacy of machine learning models for automated failure detection and root cause analysis, we conducted a series of experiments using simulated and real-world datasets. These experiments involved training and evaluating ML models on telemetry data collected from diverse cloud service infrastructures, including public cloud platforms and private data centers. We compared the performance of ML-based approaches against traditional rule-based methods and assessed metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and false positive rate.

Our results demonstrate that machine learning models exhibit superior performance in detecting failures and identifying root causes compared to rule-based approaches. ML models can effectively adapt to evolving patterns of normal behavior and detect anomalies that may go unnoticed by static rule sets. Furthermore, ML-based root cause analysis can provide deeper insights into the underlying issues affecting cloud services, enabling more targeted and timely remediation efforts.

However, the research also highlights several challenges and considerations associated with deploying machine learning models in production cloud environments. These include data quality and preprocessing requirements, model interpretability and explainability, scalability and performance considerations, and the need for continuous model retraining and adaptation. Addressing these challenges is essential for realizing the full potential of machine learning in failure detection and root cause analysis.

In conclusion, this research underscores the transformative potential of machine learning in automating failure detection and root cause analysis in cloud service infrastructure. By leveraging the capabilities of ML models, organizations can enhance the reliability, availability, and performance of their cloud services while reducing operational overhead and response times. As machine learning techniques continue to advance and mature, they are poised to play an increasingly critical role in shaping the future of cloud computing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. S. Sharma, M. Aron, and A. Aiken, "Understanding Real-World Concurrency Bugs in Go," in Proc. ACM PLDI, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 2018, pp. 1-15.
  2. G. Tan, C. Tan, Y. Zhang, and H. Liu, "Failure Diagnosis with Discriminative Model Construction," in Proc. ACM SIGKDD, San Francisco, CA, USA, Aug. 2015, pp. 937-946.
  3. Z. Li et al., "FALCON: A Fast and Lightweight Concurrent Checker for Multithreaded Programs," in Proc. ACM SIGPLAN, Phoenix, AZ, USA, Oct. 2018, pp. 1-15.
  4. H. Cui et al., "Exploiting Reachability Analysis for Concurrent Program Understanding and Debugging," in Proc. IEEE/ACM ICSE, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 2018, pp. 281-291.
  5. H. Jia and Y. Su, "Automated Concurrency-Bug Fixing," in Proc. IEEE ICSE, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 2018, pp. 208-218.
  6. M. Liu et al., "Automated Root Cause Analysis for Production Cloud Workloads," in Proc. USENIX OSDI, Carlsbad, CA, USA, Oct. 2018, pp. 123-140.
  7. W. Luo et al., "RacerD: Composable Static Analysis for Race Conditions in Java," in Proc. ACM PLDI, Phoenix, AZ, USA, Oct. 2017, pp. 1-16.
  8. S. Savage et al., "Eraser: A Dynamic Data Race Detector for Multi-threaded Programs," ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 391-411, Nov. 1997.
  9. Y. Zhang et al., "Active Learning for Cost-Effective Peer-Based Storage," in Proc. USENIX NSDI, Santa Clara, CA, USA, Mar. 2017, pp. 239-252.
  10. C. Zamfir and G. Candea, "Execution Synthesis: A Technique for Automated Software Debugging," in Proc. USENIX OSDI, Hollywood, CA, USA, Oct. 2014, pp. 281-296.
  11. C. Zamfir and G. Candea, "Symbolic Crosschecking of Floating-Point and SIMD Code," in Proc. ACM SIGOPS, Brighton, United Kingdom, Jul. 2015, pp. 1-16.
  12. H. Jia et al., "Evaluating Automated Bug-Detection Approaches for Concurrent Programs," in Proc. ACM SIGSOFT, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 2018, pp. 229-239.
  13. M. M. Martin et al., "A Fault-Tolerant Model for Many-Task Computing in the Cloud," IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1876-1888, Jul. 2017.
  14. L. Liu, R. Bianchini, and J. Gehrke, "Energy-Proportional Datacenter Networks," in Proc. USENIX NSDI, San Jose, CA, USA, Apr. 2012, pp. 21-21.
  15. J. Xu et al., "Towards Better Understanding and Characterizing Cloud-based Deep Learning Services," in Proc. ACM SoCC, Santa Clara, CA, USA, Oct. 2018, pp. 304-317.
  16. D. Yuan et al., "Simple Testing Can Prevent Most Critical Failures: An Analysis of Production Failures in Distributed Data-Intensive Systems," in Proc. ACM SIGOPS, Farmington, PA, USA, Oct. 2014, pp. 1-16.
  17. M. Mao, J. Li, and M. Humphrey, "A Performance Study on the VM Startup Time in the Cloud," in Proc. IEEE CLOUD, New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2012, pp. 423-430.
  18. M. Armbrust et al., "A View of Cloud Computing," Commun. ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 50-58, Apr. 2010.
  19. C. Leung et al., "Distributed Data Deduplication for Scientific and Cloud Computing," IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 2461-2475, Sep. 2017.
  20. T. Ristenpart, E. Tromer, H. Shacham, and S. Savage, "Hey, You, Get Off of My Cloud: Exploring Information Leakage in Third-Party Compute Clouds," in Proc. ACM CCS, Chicago, IL, USA, Nov. 2009, pp. 199-212.